On June 21, 2018, Cohen Milstein, in conjunction with the non-profit Human Rights Defense Center (HRDC), and the Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County, filed a complaint in federal court challenging the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office’s practice of placing juvenile offenders in solitary confinement.
The class-action suit was filed against Sheriff Ric Bradshaw and other Sheriff’s Office employees, for holding children, who are charged as adults, most of whom have not been convicted of any crime, in solitary confinement at the Main Detention Center of the Palm Beach County Jail as they await trial.
Palm Beach County School Board and its Superintendent, Donald E. Fennoy II are also named as defendants for allegedly denying mandated educational services to juvenile offenders held at the Jail, “including services needed to address their disabilities,” in violation of the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Cohen Milstein and co-counsel are representing three individuals, ages 16 to 17, who have been held in solitary confinement at the Palm Beach County Jail for periods ranging from 20 days to more than seven months. Some of these juvenile offenders have disabilities, including ADHD and learning disabilities.
It is widely acknowledged that prolonged placement in solitary confinement can result in serious mental health problems and can exacerbate existing problems.
A motion for a preliminary injunction, filed at the same time as the complaint, seeks a court order prohibiting the defendants from keeping incarcerated children at the Palm Beach County Jail in solitary confinement and from denying them educational services, including services to address their disabilities.
The suit raises claims under federal civil rights statutes, alleged that these practices constitute serious violations of the children’s constitutional rights, including their rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, as guaranteed by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; their rights to procedural due process prior to any deprivation of their liberty or property interests as afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment; their rights to receive educational services and programming under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”); and their rights to be free from discrimination as provided by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Section 504”), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). The suit seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, damages, and “compensatory education for education benefits denied.”
The case is H.C., et al. v. Ric Bradshaw, et al., Case No. 9:18cv80810 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida.