Leslie Kroeger will speak on the panel “Hot Topics in Class Actions” and Laura Posner will speak on the panel “Securities Class Actions” on March 1 during the Epiq Mass and Class Summit 2023 in Ft. Lauderdale, FL.

The three-day summit includes court appointed neutrals, judges and some of the best plaintiff and defense attorneys who specialize in mass tort and class action issues.

Our Complex Tort Litigation team, co-chaired by Leslie M. Kroeger, is proud to once again partner with Safe Kids of Palm Beach County for our bi-annual booster seat and car seat giveaway this Saturday, February 25, 2023, at the Boynton Beach Fire Rescue – Station 5 in Boynton Beach, Florida.

Saturday, February 25, 2023

9:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

Boynton Beach Fire Rescue – Station 5
2080 High Ridge Rd., Boynton Beach, FL 33426

Free child car seats and booster seats will be given away to families whose children have outgrown their car seats. A child must be present to receive a free seat.

Since 2012, we have distributed and helped ensure the proper installation of more than 1,100 car seats and booster seats to some of the most vulnerable families in Palm Beach and Martin Counties.

To receive information about our booster seat giveaway or to learn how you can help encourage child safety, please call us at (561) 515-1400.

We are a leader in child car seat and booster seat litigation and advocacy. We help families of children injured in child car seats and booster seats hold companies accountable for defective design, manufacture, advertising, sale, and warranty.

In Florida, we helped led the charge by lobbying the Florida legislature, resulting in the passage of SB 518, a state law requiring children under age five to be secured in federally approved child-restraint devices.

We are dedicated to protecting the children of Florida, as well as across the nation.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) held a public hearing on Tuesday, January 31, 2023, examining the implications of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) technology on equal employment opportunity. According to EEOC Chair Charlotte A. Burrows, “The goals of this hearing were to both educate a broader audience about the civil rights implications of the use of these technologies and to identify next steps that the Commission can take to prevent and eliminate unlawful bias in employers’ use of these automated technologies.” Prior to the January 31st, the EEOC most recently held a public hearing concerning AI technology in 2016. On Tuesday, twelve panelists from academia, law and industry grappled with preventing what panelist Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Deputy Director, Data Science Initiative and Professor of Computer Science, Brown University, labeled “the inevitable harm that comes when AI is used without appropriate guardrails.”

Panelists testified to various ways in which AI tools can carry implicit or explicit biases, but largely focused their remarks on how the EEOC can play a role in preventing the discriminatory use of AI by publishing additional regulatory guidance. Panelists suggested that the EEOC require employers to abide by several best practices in their use of AI, including: providing specific notice that an AI tool or process is being used to anyone who will be assessed using it; regularly reviewing the source and quality of data being considered by AI decisionmaking; ensuring that all decisions relating to the development, validation, scoring, and interpretation of AI-based assessments are documented for independent verification; and conducting such audits and verifications on an ongoing and regular basis. Many panelists suggested practices which align with the Institute for Workplace Equality’s recently published Technical Advisory Committee Report: EEO and DEI&A Considerations in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Employment Making Decisions.(Christine E. Webber, co-chair of Cohen Milstein’s Civil Rights & Employment practice, contributed plaintiff-side perspective to this report.)   

Several panelists also called on the EEOC to squarely reject the Four-Fifths Rule as a guideline for quantifying adverse impact under Title VII. Chair Burrows asked several prepared questions regarding the Four-Fifths Rule, potentially signaling that the EEOC will formally review, and perhaps re-write the Four-Fifths Rule as a measurement of adverse impact under Title VII in its future guidance.

The EEOC’s January 31st hearing follows up on its January 10th announcement of its draft Strategic Enforcement Plan for FY2023-2027, which includes increased enforcement efforts aimed at discrimination resulting from AI decision making tools. In its draft plan, the EEOC proposes to further its AI and Algorithmic Fairness Initiative by prioritizing the elimination of barriers to recruitment and hiring posed by “the use of automatic systems, including artificial intelligence or machine learning, to target advertisements, recruit applicants, or make or assist in hiring decisions where such systems intentionally exclude or adversely impact protected groups.” Last May, the EEOC published a technical assistance document titled “The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Use of Software, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence to Assess Job Applicants and Employees,” as part of this initiative. Given the EEOC’s stated goals for its January 31st hearing, its publishing similar technical assistance concerning Title VII appears likely.     

In a new complaint, the U.S. & 8 states allege Google monopolized the digital ad tech stack. They say Google used M&A and exclusionary acts such as tying, self-preferencing, market manipulation, & misuse of data to eliminate competitors. They ask for monetary damages & the break-up of Google. Join David Kully from Holland & Knight and Daniel McCuaig from Cohen Milstein as they analyze & provide insight.

ABA Webinar

January 30th at 11 a.m. EST

Carol V. Gilden has been invited to speak at the Institute for Law and Economic Policy 29th Annual Symposium at the Fairmont Grand Del Mar in San Diego, CA on January 27 at 9:00 a.m.

Ms. Gilden’s panel, “Entrapment of the Little Guy: Resisting the Erosion of Investor, Employee and Consumer Protections (Mass Arbitration, Bylaw Private Ordering and Federal/State Jurisdiction Issues)” will address, among other things, investor protection issues.

Learn more about the ILEP 29th Annual Symposium on Investor Protections.

Christine Webber will participate in the panel discussion “Using Artificial Intelligence in Hiring and Recruiting: The Future is Here” during the ABA’s 16th Annual Section of Labor & Employment Law Conference which will be held will be held on November 11, 2022 at 2:15 p.m. EST at the Marriott Marquis in Washington, DC.

Employers are increasingly seeking to leverage technology that will allow them to access broader and deeper talent pools, aggregate and assess data about applicants and employees from various sources, and make better hiring and retention decisions. While artificial intelligence and predictive analytics can provide employers many benefits, use of data analytics can pose new legal risks for employers, including risks of discrimination claims for disparate treatment and disparate impact based on race and disability. With a demonstration of how AI is used in recruiting and hiring, this panel will give real world examples of what AI looks like in the workplace and best practices for integrating it while mitigating legal risk. This panel will discuss examples of using AI in the workplace, including biometrics, and how employers can benefit from AI while using best practices to mitigate legal risk. The panel also will cover new state laws regarding AI in the workplace, EEOC’s initiative on tech-based recruiting, and trends in AG enforcement.

 

PANELISTS:

  • Toni Michelle Jackson, Crowell & Moring
  • Sania W. Khan, U.S. Department of Labor
  • George L. Washington, Jr., Orange Business Services
  • Christine Webber, Cohen Milstein
  • Damien Patrick Williams, Virginia Tech

 

Register now.

Kai Richter has been invited to speak as part of the American Law Institute’s “Employee Benefit Plans of Tax-Exempt and Governmental Employers 2022” CLE webcast on October 13 at 2:45 p.m. EST.

Mr. Richter’s discussion, titled “Current State of Plan Litigation and Its Implications,” will address:

  • Fee, expenses, and investment fund alternative-related litigation
  • Cybersecurity litigation
  • Litigation risks unique to tax-exempt and governmental employers (other than church plan litigation)
  • Best practices for risk mitigation

For more information and registration for this program, please visit American Law Institute.

Leslie M. Kroeger has been invited to speak at the Masters of Mass Tort’s TOXIC: Forever Chemicals and Contaminated Water conference hosted by Archer on September 13, 2022 in Denver, Colorado.

Ms. Kroeger will present on two panels: “Practical Tips for Litigating PFAS Cases” and “Comparing and Contrasting Three High-Profile Water Cases: C8 DuPont, BP Deep Horizon, and Flint Water (The Lessons Learned).”

Learn more: Masters of Mass Tort’s TOXIC: Forever Chemicals and Contaminated Water conference

Takisha D. Richardson has been invited to speak at the National Crime Victim Bar Association’s (NCVBA) Civil Justice for Victims of Crime Seminar in West Palm Beach, FL on August 25, 2022 (10 am – 4 pm).

This free seminar will educate victim service providers and advocates on the resources and strategies available to victims through civil action. Ms. Richardson will also provide insight into the civil justice system and share her experience with helping victims.

Register for the NCVBA Civil Justice for Victims of Crime Seminar today!

The NCVBA is dedicated to assisting crime victims rebuild their lives by providing support and resources to the civil attorneys representing those who have dedicated their lives to crime victims.

Christine E. Webber will speak at the 2022 NELA Annual Convention on Saturday, July 2, 2022 (3:45 – 5:00 p.m. PST) at the San Francisco Marriott Marquis. This is an in-person CLE program for plaintiff attorneys.

Ms. Webber’s panel discussion, “Evidence in Summary Judgment v. Trial Day,” will focus on how to best determine what evidence to present at trial. Documents and witness statements or depositions you relied upon in summary judgment are likely to be on your exhibit list or witness list for trial too, but even with what is, at core, the same evidence, you still have to consider issues that may arise in using that evidence at trial.

Among other things, the panelists will discuss:

  • Moving from citing deposition excerpts on summary judgment to using deposition designations instead of live testimony at trial.
  • Expert testimony. Moving from report at summary judgment to live testimony at trial.
  • Objections at trial that the business record exception is not available, even if such an argument was not raised on summary judgment briefing.
  • Evidentiary challenges over website material Defendant may not have bothered to raise at summary judgment.

Click through for more information on the 2022 NELA Annual Convention.

The National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA) is at the forefront of employee rights law, established is to empower workers’ rights attorneys through legal training, promoting a fair judiciary, and advocating for laws and policies that level the playing field for workers.