To discuss any questions you might have about this case or to learn more about the issue of pregnancy
discrimination, please click here to schedule a confidential consultation. Alternatively, please contact
attorney Aniko Schwarcz directly at 202.408.4600 or aschwarcz@cohenmilstein.com.

 

On January 25, 2019, Cohen Milstein and the American Civil Liberties Union’s Women’s Rights Project filed an amended complaint in a putative Title VII employment discrimination class action against AT&T Mobility LLC (AT&T) for violating the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  The lawsuit also includes individual Title VII, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Family and Medical Leave Act claims on behalf of the named plaintiff.

Case Background

When Congress enacted the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, it recognized that “discrimination against pregnant women is one of the chief ways in which women’s careers have been impeded and women employees treated like second-class employees.”

Cynthia Allen, the named plaintiff in this putative class action, suffered precisely these types of impediments to her career—due to her choice to become a mother—that the PDA sought to prevent.  Ms. Allen alleges that she was penalized and subsequently terminated by AT&T for her pregnancy- and childbirth-related absences.  AT&T terminated Ms. Allen shortly after her child was born, detrimentally destabilizing one of the most exciting and life-changing times for her family.  Ms. Allen seeks to represent all non-exempt, non-managerial female employees in AT&T’s corporate stores nationwide who were denied excused absences for pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions at any time from April 26, 2017 under AT&T’s Sales Attendance Guidance (SAG) policy.

AT&T’s SAG policy, which governs attendance procedures for non-exempt, non-managerial employees in AT&T’s company-owned stores nationwide, imposes a “point” each time an employee is absent or late to work.  An employee is terminated if she accumulates too many points.  Although the policy provides for thirteen separate categories of excused absences, nowhere does it mention pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.

The PDA prevents companies from treating pregnant and non-pregnant employees differently in extending employment benefits, including exemptions from disciplinary policies.  AT&T’s SAG policy must comply with the PDA and must provide excused absences for pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions.

For More Information About This Case

Female AT&T employees who have information about AT&T’s SAG policy or have experienced difficulty receiving excused absences for pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions while working for AT&T should contact Kalpana Kotagal at kkotagal@cohenmilstein.com or 202-408-4600, or Gillian Thomas at gthomas@aclu.org, (212) 549-2500, .

The case is styled: Cynthia Allen, et al. v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Case No. 1:18-cv-03730-WMR, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.