A lawsuit filed in the Northern District of Illinois accuses GreatBanc Trust Co. of mishandling a stock plan transaction that caused employees of Triad Manufacturing Inc. to pay $106 million for employer stock that may have been worth less than $4 million.
The lawsuit Smith v. GreatBanc Trust Company, et al., brought on behalf of participants and beneficiaries of the Triad Manufacturing, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), alleges numerous violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in connection with the sale of Triad Manufacturing, Inc. to the ESOP for an inflated value, which caused a multi-million-dollar loss to the ESOP. Please complete the form below to learn more.
Cohen Milstein recognizes the importance of your privacy and personal data. Information provided in this survey is confidential and will not be shared/sold.
The attorneys investigating this matter are Michelle Yau (admitted in Massachusetts and the District of Columbia) and Mary J. Bortscheller (admitted in Illinois, Minnesota and the District of Columbia).
Please feel free to contact us with any additional questions.
Ciara O'Neill, Paralegal – firstname.lastname@example.org
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500, West Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: (888) 240-0775 or (202) 408-4600
Fax: (202) 408-4699
The class action complaint, filed Wednesday by former Triad employee James Smith, claims GreatBanc signed off on the deal without performing adequate due diligence. GreatBanc, which allegedly represented the Triad employees by serving as the stock plan trustee, disregarded structural problems and failed to account for Triad’s “shrinking customer base due to the widespread closure of retail stores,” Smith claims.
At issue is a 2015 transaction in which Triad—a producer of custom wood furniture and fixtures—became 100% employee-owned through the creation of an employee stock ownership plan. Smith alleges that Triad employees had no input on the deal, which significantly reduced their retirement savings and caused them “tens of millions of dollars in losses.”
Specifically, Smith says the deal was based on unrealistic and inflated financial projections that didn’t account for the rapid closure of brick-and-mortar retail stores, which make up Triad’s primary customer base. Smith also charges GreatBanc with failing to properly account for how the deal’s financing would affect Triad’s balance sheet and future cash flow.
. . .
Cohen, Milstein, Sellers & Toll PLLC represents the proposed class.
Finish reading ”GreatBanc Hit With Class Suit Over $106 Million Stock Plan Deal” at Bloomberg Law.